Skip to main content

All the Bloody Shakespeare - Troilus and Cressida

 Troilus and Cressida


Falling down a hole with your legs chopped off feels like reading this play.


Close friends get to call it TC. It’s a bit of a weird title for the play because the eponymous lovers barely get a look in on the thing. Their entire story is this, Troilus falls in love with Cressida, then sees her flirting with Diomedes and gets hurt feelings. That’s literally the whole thing, let’s try not to think about it. Troilus isn't even on the side we're supposed to sympathise with.

You can see some obvious influence from Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, and a huge influence from Seneca’s Trojan Women (yes, I can justify this statement, come at me). And what comes out is something not quite as good as either. However, the most obvious influence that Shakespeare draws on is Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.

The play starts out with a lot of exposition, and I do mean a lot! We’re talking three acts almost entirely given over to background information, political posturing and a few clumsy gags performed by Jar Jar Theristes. The Greeks and the Troyans (Shakespeare doesn’t know the correct word is Trojans, what an idiot!) have been at war for ages and it’s getting really old. Yoda isn’t in it but there are some of the greatest heroes and fighters in the history of the world gathered together at the brink of a great battle: Hector, Achilles, Ajax, Ulysses (that one is on Seneca), Aeneas, Priam and Menelaus (who isn’t mad but is in fact Spartan). And what way to better use these action heroes than to have them engaging in extended discussions and reading letters. The Greeks want the Greeks to win and the Troyans want the Troyans to win and because they’re so equally matched, it’s a bit of a stalemate. The narrative favours the Greeks so you can think of them as The Rebels, but it’s a very stupid war so morality doesn’t come into it much.

What isn’t helping is that the Greek’s best fighter Achilles is more interested in staying in his tent with his “friend” Patroclus than he is in winning the war. There is no direct statement that Achilles and Patroclus are lovers, but they get a better love story than Troilus and Cressida do. They sulk, they hide away and when Patroclus is killed by Hector, Achilles goes on a rampage and brings us to the best part of the play, Act Five.
It is a love that dare not speak its name.

Act Five is a riot. Literally. Shakespeare packs as much action as he can into the last section of the play, presumably in the assumption that if you end on a high note - the big fight then everything will be okay. It is the exact same strategy George Lucas picked when writing the Phantom Menace - endless politics and bureaucracy then a bit of Darth Maul to perk it all up. If Shakespeare .had been paying attention when he watched the prequels he might have avoided falling into the same trap (or he might at least have added a podrace to break it up a bit). In this section Hector is taking the place of Darth Maul - in that he is the best fighter and hands down the most interesting character. Much like the Phantom Menace it is not a fair fight. Hector has finished fighting for the day and is just getting into his pyjamas when Achilles and his gang of merry rampagers surround him and stab him up. This is much less heroic than the usual one on one portrayal of this fight in which Achilles comes off as heroic, there is no remedption for the Achilles character - he starts out a whiny turd and he wins his battle as a whiny turd. Which, for a heroic epic is not particularly gratifying. It would be like having the hero of Phantom Menace lose when fighting two on one and then pulling a "sand in the eyes" trick. It's just not a satisfying ending. It certainly doesn't justify all of the boring

So what becomes of Troillus and his beloved Cressida? They are, after all, supposed to be what the play is about it. Well, not much. When she leaves him for Diomedes he gets a bit sad. It's rubbish, this whole play is rubbish and a waste of your time. There is no other circumstance under which you will hear me say this but you would be better off watching the Phantom Menace. I hated this play so much, that I haven't been able to read another of his plays for sixth months.

2/5 - It's not a tragedy, it's not funny, it's not interesting. Get it together Shakey.
.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Flash Fiction: The Words and the Nausea

A theory gaining some ground in the scientific community is that the whole universe is an artificial creation, like a computer game or the Matrix. There are, apparently, lines of code in the fabric of the universe that make this a dead give away (philosophically speaking).  The chances are that we all live in some cosmological playpen, like the Holodeck in Star Trek the Next Generation. And, yes the holograms became sentien t and have started to kill each other. The truly terrifying aspect of this concept is not that the thought that all life is meaningless and without purpose, or even that all of our suffering (the one thing we can truly hold sacrosanct) is for nothing. The truly terrifying aspect is the thought that I may have become stuck on the second level, got bored and spent my whole life playing the mini-games. None of this really concerned me much until one day as I was on my way to Tesco, I saw the evidence of it. In giant twelve-foot letters, covering both cloud and vapo...
Post a Comment
Read more

All the Bloody Shakespeare - Measure for Measure

  Measure for Measure and the best joke in Shakespeare Right let’s get this out of the way, I have never read a Shakespeare play cover to cover and finished it thinking that’s a great read. I’ll read that again for fun. Then I read Measure for Measure. I think I can say without hyperbole that Measure for Measure is Shakespeare’s most relevant play. You can talk about your universal themes in the great tragedies – fate, revenge, ambition, failure but Measure for Measure has specific themes that are so dead on the nose they could have been written a few weeks ago. Measure for Measure is a play about sexual misconduct and corrupt powerful men. It’s a play about how a legal system becomes corrupt when everyone working in it shares the same corrupt values. It takes those two ideas and tackles them in-depth.  Mercifully, loads of other people have picked up on this and you can be spared my thoughts on the matter. If you’re interested just google Measure for Measure #metoo....
Post a Comment
Read more

All the bloody Shakespeare: A Comedy of Errors

Different personalities, it's this easy. A Comedy of Errors seems like an odd play to open the Complete Works of Shakespeare with.  First of all, it's not very funny.  Second of all, it's a bit of a mess. The basic idea is a lot like Van Damme's Double Impact, identical twins (separated at birth) show up in the same area and their easily mistaken identity causes a sequence of needless conflicts.  That said, it is a lot less structured than Double Impact and has a much less gratifying conclusion.  The twins in Double Impact defeat a crime syndicate, all the two Antipholus brothers manage is figuring out they're brothers.  And they don't even figure that out, their dad tells them. Shakespeare wastes some good opportunities for comedy and depth by having one Antipholus attracted to the other's sister in law rather than his shrew of a wife. And, disappointingly, nothing comes of that either. Additionally, the two Antipholus brothers are pretty much carbon copi...
Post a Comment
Read more