Skip to main content

All the Bloody Shakespeare - Troilus and Cressida

 Troilus and Cressida


Falling down a hole with your legs chopped off feels like reading this play.


Close friends get to call it TC. It’s a bit of a weird title for the play because the eponymous lovers barely get a look in on the thing. Their entire story is this, Troilus falls in love with Cressida, then sees her flirting with Diomedes and gets hurt feelings. That’s literally the whole thing, let’s try not to think about it. Troilus isn't even on the side we're supposed to sympathise with.

You can see some obvious influence from Chaucer’s Troilus and Criseyde, and a huge influence from Seneca’s Trojan Women (yes, I can justify this statement, come at me). And what comes out is something not quite as good as either. However, the most obvious influence that Shakespeare draws on is Star Wars: The Phantom Menace.

The play starts out with a lot of exposition, and I do mean a lot! We’re talking three acts almost entirely given over to background information, political posturing and a few clumsy gags performed by Jar Jar Theristes. The Greeks and the Troyans (Shakespeare doesn’t know the correct word is Trojans, what an idiot!) have been at war for ages and it’s getting really old. Yoda isn’t in it but there are some of the greatest heroes and fighters in the history of the world gathered together at the brink of a great battle: Hector, Achilles, Ajax, Ulysses (that one is on Seneca), Aeneas, Priam and Menelaus (who isn’t mad but is in fact Spartan). And what way to better use these action heroes than to have them engaging in extended discussions and reading letters. The Greeks want the Greeks to win and the Troyans want the Troyans to win and because they’re so equally matched, it’s a bit of a stalemate. The narrative favours the Greeks so you can think of them as The Rebels, but it’s a very stupid war so morality doesn’t come into it much.

What isn’t helping is that the Greek’s best fighter Achilles is more interested in staying in his tent with his “friend” Patroclus than he is in winning the war. There is no direct statement that Achilles and Patroclus are lovers, but they get a better love story than Troilus and Cressida do. They sulk, they hide away and when Patroclus is killed by Hector, Achilles goes on a rampage and brings us to the best part of the play, Act Five.
It is a love that dare not speak its name.

Act Five is a riot. Literally. Shakespeare packs as much action as he can into the last section of the play, presumably in the assumption that if you end on a high note - the big fight then everything will be okay. It is the exact same strategy George Lucas picked when writing the Phantom Menace - endless politics and bureaucracy then a bit of Darth Maul to perk it all up. If Shakespeare .had been paying attention when he watched the prequels he might have avoided falling into the same trap (or he might at least have added a podrace to break it up a bit). In this section Hector is taking the place of Darth Maul - in that he is the best fighter and hands down the most interesting character. Much like the Phantom Menace it is not a fair fight. Hector has finished fighting for the day and is just getting into his pyjamas when Achilles and his gang of merry rampagers surround him and stab him up. This is much less heroic than the usual one on one portrayal of this fight in which Achilles comes off as heroic, there is no remedption for the Achilles character - he starts out a whiny turd and he wins his battle as a whiny turd. Which, for a heroic epic is not particularly gratifying. It would be like having the hero of Phantom Menace lose when fighting two on one and then pulling a "sand in the eyes" trick. It's just not a satisfying ending. It certainly doesn't justify all of the boring

So what becomes of Troillus and his beloved Cressida? They are, after all, supposed to be what the play is about it. Well, not much. When she leaves him for Diomedes he gets a bit sad. It's rubbish, this whole play is rubbish and a waste of your time. There is no other circumstance under which you will hear me say this but you would be better off watching the Phantom Menace. I hated this play so much, that I haven't been able to read another of his plays for sixth months.

2/5 - It's not a tragedy, it's not funny, it's not interesting. Get it together Shakey.
.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Big Question 3/5 - Why we still need storytelling

In the end, even preternaturally large gorillas must face their mortality. Having touched briefly on the Christian creation myth in the last instalment, I would like to return to it just as briefly to talk about storytelling. Storytelling seems to have been what our ancient ancestors used in lieu of information. Creation myths exist almost universally throughout human culture and they are a good example of how literature fills the gaps of human knowledge. Certain things within the human experience are simply unknowable and, it tends to be those unknowable elements of our existence that stop us from sleeping properly. As a man who prides himself on having moved past the Eighteenth century regretting only the loss of cottage industry I am able to see creation myth for what it is - literature. In The Bible, we are given the following information: that God created the world from the word. However, there is no explanation of what force created God. Most of the important back-story is absent...
Post a Comment
Read more

Going to work is just awful

See, Bukowski gets it. I've just seen the #thingsIwillmissaboutlockdownhashtag trending.  So, I'll say this, I will miss not having to go to work. Look, I know people have it bad.   This Covid-19 thing is kicking the world’s economy right in the ass and taking down a lot of good people, both physically and financially.   And yes, this post is coming from a place of privilege; because, if I were about to miss a meal I know I’d be happy to get back to work.   Over the years, I’ve done some pretty humiliating stuff to make ends meet: from cleaning bottles of piss left by workmen on construction sites to lining up at an agency at 4am in the hope they might send me out for the day.   Thankfully, that’s all a while behind me, and right now, in a usual year, I would be marking exams for 14 hours a day seven days a week to top up my meagre teaching wage. So, let’s be honest, work is shit.   The average person with an average job, on average, earns below the a...
Post a Comment
Read more

The big question 2/5: What the hell am I talking about?

Whilst there is room to debate the issue within the creation of matter, humanity as we know it begins with language. In the beginning, reads   The Bible , was the word and the word was with God. Not only that but the word is so powerful that God only has to use a few more words to create light, the universe and all life as we know it. The Bible holds words in pretty high regard and so it should, the Bible is all just words. Seems like a simple point to make, most books primarily consist of words. However, take a minute to stop and think about the profound effect that one collection of words has had on the world. Think about the wars, the conversions, the cultures lost suppressed and destroyed. Think about the personal sacrifices it inspired, the acts of compassion, of heroism and of generosity. Feel free to stop and make a cup of tea if you want, it always hurts my head to think about it too. The Bible   is only one book in one branch of literature; its influence on the world,...
Post a Comment
Read more