All the Bloody Shakespeare: Much Ado about Nothing

Benedick and Beatrice, still work as a comedic device.

If you're going to have a bad guy, why not call him Don Jon the Bastard? If he happens to be an actual bastard so much more the better.

Much Ado About Nothing isn't as original or entertaining as Midsummer Night's Dream, but it is more consistent. There's no onerous songs or tedious play within a play stuff, just two straightforward intersecting plots.

One is about a rich guy (Don Pedro) who is marrying a perfect rich gal (Hero). The big obstacle being that his bastard brother (Don John the Bastard) convinces everyone she's having an affair and the marriage falls through and she appears to have killed herself. It's pretty good, but nowhere near as funny as the suicide gag in Romeo and Juliet.

Anyway, it all works out, and since Hero's hymen is intact she gets the green light for a quicky marriage and an expedient hymen cracking. Btw, if you're finding all this hymen talk a little gross, you may not find the end of this play all that romantic.

The subplot centres around a constantly bickering couple (Beatrice and Benedick) who don't want to marry, but really do. If you're familiar with the show Friends it's a bit like the "will they won't they" plot between Chandler and Joey, except they're both Chandler. And they get a happy ending: instead of one of them ending up alone and the other in a sibling marriage to a woman obviously haunted by forbidden desire for her brother.

It's a standard romantic comedy, the plot works, the jokes work and there's only one minor incident of antisemitism (antisemitism in Shakespeare is like doves in a John Woo film, it's just always there). It's all fine, no big surprises and nothing too horrific. One of the servants is exploited but she seems okay with it; let's face it, her other option is being part of the crowd who think hymens are where it's at - so you can't really blame her.

If I have one gripe with the play, it's the ending. Here is how Don John the Bastard's plot closes:

"Benedict: Think not on him till to-morrow. I’ll devise thee brave punishments for him. Strike up, pipers."

That's the last line of the play. Not much of a resolution but everyone is happy, so it might not need much else.

4/5 It's a low 4 but, as Shakespeare comedies go, this is about the best you can hope for.

PS. Benedick is a combination of the Latin word for good, and the English vernacular for penis. And even though it wouldn't have worked at the time, you have to applaud Shak's foresight on that one.

Comments

Going to work is just awful

See, Bukowski gets it. I've just seen the #thingsIwillmissaboutlockdownhashtag trending. So, I'll say this, I will miss not having to go to work. Look, I know people have it bad. This Covid-19 thing is kicking the world’s economy right in the ass and taking down a lot of good people, both physically and financially. And yes, this post is coming from a place of privilege; because, if I were about to miss a meal I know I’d be happy to get back to work. Over the years, I’ve done some pretty humiliating stuff to make ends meet: from cleaning bottles of piss left by workmen on construction sites to lining up at an agency at 4am in the hope they might send me out for the day. Thankfully, that’s all a while behind me, and right now, in a usual year, I would be marking exams for 14 hours a day seven days a week to top up my meagre teaching wage. So, let’s be honest, work is shit. The average person with an average job, on average, earns below the a...

All the Bloody Shakespeare: Love's Labour 's Lost

Imagine this four times over but with letters instead of conversations and Elizabethan hygiene standards. I was quite excited to read Love's Labour's Lost, it starts really well. The king and his three mates all swear off women for three years to pursue academic interests and higher purposes. Oh, and the king makes it law that everyone else has to do the same for ease of plot development. It's all going well until a princess / potential queen shows up with her exactly three friends. There's a lot of potential here, and we see an immediate step up in terms of the quality of writing. You know those nut jobs who think all Shakespeare's plays were written by different people? Well, I almost thought they had a point for a minute. Almost every phrase the king utters is profound and well-composed. This can't be written by the same bloke that wrote Two Gentlemen of Verona, I erroneously posited. Then we get Costard (a clown). Costard has already broken ...

All the Bloody Shakespeare - All's Well That Ends Well

Disguise isn't necessary for a certain type of man . All’s Well That Ends Well is one of the more interesting Shakespearean comedies, at least philosophically speaking – the plot does drag a little in parts. One thing you might notice about it right off the bat is that it doesn’t read like Shakespeare. It is more grammatically modern than most Shakespeare plays and a little bit easier to read. This has led some very, very clever people to argue that it is written by Thomas Middleton. This may or may not be true, it would be difficult to prove without at least secondary evidence. For sure, the subject matter is way off from Shakespeare’s usual woman-hating, Jew bating, servant kicking provender and a lot of critics actively dislike this play. I don’t, to be clear, it’s one of the better ones. Anyway, to get this out of the way, the main claims to it being at least co-written by Middleton are as follows: Firstly: The grammar tends towards clarity and simplicity of meaning and the rh...

Thomas Ouphe

Search This Blog